Advanced Search

Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2744 v. Meghan - 2024 ONCAT 169 - 2024-11-18

[28] The second incident occurred on July 13, 2024, at 8:40 p.m. The incident report states that security staff “immediately” attended at Mr. Meghan’s door where they recorded a video of decibel levels measured with a sound level meter. The video recording shows readings ranging between 52.2 and 62.7 decibels over its 13   [...]  He also submitted a video he made using a sound level meter which demonstrates that the level recorded was higher when he was in the hallway than it was when he walked into his unit.   [...]  Further, while the video Mr. Meghan submitted shows decibel readings which are higher in the hallway than in his unit, there is no discernible music playing in his unit on that video.

Cho v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 1644 - 2024 ONCAT 156 - 2024-10-15

I do not find these document inadequate records because they were not part of the requested records – they were produced during the CAT case with the purpose of providing context regarding the requested records.   [...]  [21] The Applicant claimed the time to produce the By‐law No. 5 records was excessive. She provided a video that showed that she could redact the records more quickly than the Respondent.   [...]  (c) subject to subsection (5), records relating to specific units or owners; or (d) any prescribed records.

Kovalenko v. Romanino et al. - 2024 ONCAT 151 - 2024-09-30

The log records numerous smoking events dating back to 2021 – all of which he attributes to Ms. Romanino.   [...]   of the log provided by Mr. Kovalenko and provided an affidavit from a partner at the law firm where she works, which verifies that on at least some of the occasions recorded by Mr. Kovalenko, Ms. Romanino was seen in the office, and thus could not have been smoking during the "smoking events" recorded by Mr. Kovalenko.   [...]  Even if I accept Mr. Kovalenko’s log is, for the most part, accurate, Mr. Kovalenko’s log records on average 3-4 instances of smoking per day (some days more, some days less, some days no recorded events).

Chown v. Frontenac Condominium Corporation No. 19 - 2024 ONCAT 133 - 2024-08-28

Video Conference – May 20, 2024 REASONS FOR DECISION A. INTRODUCTION   [...]  These rulings were provided to the parties and form part of the record of the hearing. They will not be repeated in this decision. They include, among other things: governance issues outside the jurisdiction of the Tribunal; a request for a confidentiality order; requests for adjournments, a request to add late witnesses;

Simmons v. Thunder Bay Condominium Corporation No. 8 - 2024 ONCAT 130 - 2024-08-22

[11] Term 6.3 requires TBCC 8 to (a) continue regular inspection of the mechanical aspects of the pool operation and investigate visual and audio records of nightly noise emanating from the pool and pump areas, and (b) take steps to eliminate or diminish or regulate identified offending noises that are in keeping with the   [...]  The log indicates that upon receipt of each complaint, TBCC 8 reviewed audio video (motion activated) footage of the pool area. None of the complaints were verified, and no activity was recorded during the middle of the night.   [...]  [26] Having reviewed the evidence before me, I find TBCC 8 has not breached term 6.5 of the SA. In making this finding, I considered the fact that TBCC 8 has demonstrated that it has investigated each of the Applicant’s noise complaints by reviewing audio video footage. The Applicant’s complaints were not verified, leading

Clarkson v. Brant Vacant Land Condominium Corporation No. 110 - 2024 ONCAT 95 - 2024-06-27

If any of these records do not exist, BVLCC 110 is to provide a detailed written confirmation itemizing the record and explaining that it does not exist.   [...]  1. Is Ms. Clarkson entitled to receive copies of the requested records? 2. Did BVLCC 110 refuse to provide the requested records without a reasonable excuse?   [...]  These are records to which Ms. Clarkson is entitled. [12] The budget, and the approved financial statements, are records listed in Section 55 (1) of the Act and O. Reg. 48/01 as records the corporation is required to maintain.

Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 1053 v. Ahluwalia et al. - 2024 ONCAT 63 - 2024-05-08

Key fobs and security video [10] Mr. Schwartz’s statement includes information about the use of key fobs that are registered to the unit, and a review of security video.   [...]  So, records that show that a fob registered to Ms. Ahluwalia was used does not establish if the fob was used by Ms. Ahluwalia or Mr. Ahluwalia.   [...]  [15] Mr. Schwartz testified that the condominium installed a video licence recognition system a few years ago to keep track of parking in the resident parking area.

Bogue v. Carleton Condominium Corporation No. 288 - 2024 ONCAT 15 - 2024-01-26

Request 1 relates to all audio\video recordings of the virtual annual general meeting of the Respondent held on July 22, 2022 (“2022 AGM”).   [...]  1. Is the audio\video recording of the virtual 2022 AGM of the Respondent held on July 22, 2022 a record of the corporation?   [...]  Issue 1: Is the audio\video recording of the virtual 2022 AGM of the Respondent held on July 22, 2022 a record of the corporation?

Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2448 v. Ihejirika et al. - 2023 ONCAT 178 - 2023-11-24

In addition to the correspondence I have summarized above, the Applicant uploaded 50 security incident reports and 46 audio/video recordings to the CAT-ODR system. Ms. Ihejirika uploaded 206 audio/video recordings.   [...]  She noted that Ms. Muzyka had no video recording of what she testified were Ms. Ihejirika’s threats to burn or flood the building.   [...]  [59] Notwithstanding her submission that audio/video recordings are of limited evidentiary value, Ms. Ihejirika submitted 206 recordings to support her argument that TSCC 2448 is a noisy building.

Park v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2775 - 2023 ONCAT 171 - 2023-11-10

[26] At the video conference call, there was some contention concerning these standards.   [...]  Board members reviewed the security video taken by the security camera during Mr. Koval’s visit to the gym. TSCC 2775 alleges that Mr. Koval’s description of what he did to take the sound readings for the doors does not accord with his actions as depicted in the video.   [...]  The engineers agree that noise from sources other than the gym were recorded. Mr. Park’s consultant felt these were likely due to traffic noise.

Jalbout v. Brown et al. - 2023 ONCAT 147 - 2023-10-12

[31] In support of her claim, Ms. Jalbout also submitted a video recording of one such alleged incident, under the title ‘Nuisance - Excessive noise from Jaymie’s room’.   [...]  They add that the video recording submitted by Ms. Jalbout is the only recording of such noise and that it is a low volume recording of a normal conversation, with some giggling.   [...]  b) In regard to her video recording evidence of the bedroom window incident (‘Excessive noise from Jaymie’s room’), one can only hear a low volume recording of a normal conversation, with some laughter or giggling, without any music or shouting; and

Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 570 v. Cetin et al. - 2023 ONCAT 116 - 2023-08-18

A video recording of the incident was entered as evidence. [11] I accept the undisputed and credible evidence of MTCC 570 and of Mr. Cetin’s neighbour.

Nurmi v. York Condominium Corporation No. 43 - 2023 ONCAT 99 - 2023-07-20

Video hearing – April 12, 2023 REASONS FOR DECISION A. INTRODUCTION [1] This case involved an Applicant unit owner unsatisfied with records received, and how requests for them were handled.   [...]  1. outstanding records; 2. claims that records provided were inadequate; and 3. potential financial consequences.   [...]  I could not assess the adequacy of this record without it. It is clear that this record has not been properly maintained.