CAT Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

CONDOMINIUM AUTHORITY TRIBUNAL

DATE: February 5, 2025
CASE:
2025-00017N
Citation: Boulos v. Peel Condominium Corporation No. 272, 2025 ONCAT 17

Order under section 1.41 of the Condominium Act, 1998.

Member: Ian Darling, Chair

The Applicant, 
Alfred Boulos 
Self-Represented 

The Respondent, 
Peel Condominium Corporation No. 272 

Submission Dates: January 21, 2025, to January 28, 2025

DISMISSAL ORDER

[1]       An application was submitted to the Condominium Authority Tribunal (CAT) on January 17, 2025. The CAT has reviewed the application and proposed to dismiss this application under Rule 19.1 of the CAT’s Rules of Practice for the following reasons:

1.         The CAT’s jurisdiction is established by the Ontario Government in Ontario Regulation 179/17 (“O. Reg. 179/17”). The CAT does not have the legal authority to decide issues that are outside its jurisdiction.

2.         This application was filed as a dispute about the condo corporation’s finances and board governance.

3.         The Problem Description referred to the Reserve Fund Study and the condominium corporation’s budget regarding contracts for repairs/maintenance work.

4.         A letter from the condo corporation was uploaded to the application. It includes reference to a leak in the building, which would result in consequent charges to the unit for investigation and repairs. 

[2]       The Applicant was provided an opportunity to update their application to relate it to matters that fall within the Tribunal’s jurisdiction. The Applicant made no changes to the application besides uploading the letter mentioned above.

[3]       The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the application. The Applicant did not respond to the Notice.

[4]       The case is dismissed because the CAT has no legal power to decide the issues in dispute.

ORDER

[5]       The Application is dismissed.

 

 

 

Ian Darling

 

Chair, Condominium Authority Tribunal

Released on: February 5, 2025

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.