CAT Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

CONDOMINIUM AUTHORITY TRIBUNAL

 

DATE: April 25, 2023
CASE:
2022-00736N

Citation: Kassir v. Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 607, 2023 ONCAT 60

Order under Rule 4 of the Condominium Authority Tribunal’s Rules of Practice.

Member: Marc Bhalla, Member

The Applicant,
Bashar Kassir
Self-Represented

The Respondent,
Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 607
Represented by Lidia Serebriakova, Agent

Submission Dates: March 31, 2023 to April 14, 2023

MOTION ORDER

[1]       I was assigned the mediation of this case. The parties took part and mediation ended without resolving the case.

[2]       In evolving my role from mediator to preparing the parties for a hearing, I had concern that relief sought would not be within the CAT’s jurisdiction to provide. This included a request for an order to change condominium by-laws.

[3]       I needed to ensure that the case was within CAT jurisdiction; otherwise, I would dismiss it. On March 31, 2023, I issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (the “Notice”). The parties were given the chance to make submissions, which the Applicant did.

[4]       This motion order is limited to considering if the case should be dismissed based on the Notice. I did not consider confidential settlement negotiations in mediation, the strength of positions offered since mediation or if issues for a hearing are within CAT jurisdiction at the level of scrutiny that could take place in Stage 3.

[5]       As the gate keeper of this case moving ahead, my responsibility is to ensure the case merits a hearing. This is a different focus than one which assesses prospects of success or receives full arguments and replies about jurisdiction. It involves ensuring resources would not be wasted on a case beyond the CAT’s jurisdiction.

[6]       The Applicant’s reply to the Notice has clarified matters. The issues and relief sought at a hearing might include:

1.         If there is a lack of compliance by the Respondent in enforcing noise and nuisance provisions in its governing documents.

2.         If an order for enforcement of the Respondent’s governing documents is warranted.

3.         If the Applicant should recover costs.           

[7]       I am satisfied the Applicant has addressed the Notice; this case may move ahead to Stage 3 for a hearing.

 

 

 

Marc Bhalla

 

Member, Condominium Authority Tribunal

Released on: April 25, 2023

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.