CAT Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

CONDOMINIUM AUTHORITY TRIBUNAL

DATE: January 3, 2023
CASE:
2022-00611N

Citation: Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2823 v. Lewis et al., 2023 ONCAT 1

Order under section 1.47 of the Condominium Act, 1998.

Member: Brian Cook, Member

The Applicant,
Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2823

Represented by Justin McLarty, Agent

The Respondents,
Elizabeth Lewis

Self-represented

 

Kirenia Lindsay

Self-represented

 

Chantelle Sulaiman

Self-represented

CONSENT ORDER

 

[1]       The parties to this Application agree to settle this case with a Consent Order on the terms that follow.

Background

[2]       Elizabeth Lewis and Kirenia Lindsay are the owners of a suite in Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2823 (“TSCC 2823”). Chantelle Sulaiman is a tenant in the unit.

[3]       TSCC 2823 brought this Application because it has received complaints that Ms. Sulaiman’s dogs are disturbing other residents because of barking. The respondents do not agree that all the complaints are warranted.

Consent Order

[4]       The parties agree to settle this Application by way of this Consent Order on the following terms:

1.         Ms. Sulaiman will vacate the unit no later than January 31, 2023. If that proves not possible, she will ensure that the dogs are no longer in the unit by that date. She may move out earlier than January 31, 2023.

2.         TSCC 2823 will absorb any legal or other costs associated with this Application or events giving rise to it.

Order

[5]          The Tribunal issues this Order on the terms set out above. This Order will close the Tribunal file.

Compliance

[6]       If any of the Parties fails to comply with any of the terms of this order, it may be enforced through the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.

 

_________________________________

Brian Cook,

Member, Condominium Authority Tribunal

 

Released on: January 3, 2023

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.