PART C – Decision under Appeal
The decision under appeal is the Ministry of Social Development and Social Innovation (the ministry)
reconsideration decision dated July 17, 2017 which determined that under section 9(2) of the
Employment and Assistance for Persons with Disabilities Regulation (EAPWDR), the appellant was
not eligible for disability assistance for July 2017 because his net income in May 2017 determined
under Schedule B of the EAPWDR exceeded his disability assistance rate determined under
Schedule A of the EAPWDR.
PART D – Relevant Legislation
Employment and Assistance for Persons with Disabilities Regulation (EAPWDR) Sections 1, 9 and 24
Employment and Assistance for Persons with Disabilities Regulation (EAPWDR), Schedule A,
Section 2
Employment and Assistance for Persons with Disabilities Regulation (EAPWDR), Schedule B,
Sections 1, 2 and 3(1)(b)
PART E – Summary of Facts
Note:
when
the
ministry
representative
had
not
joined
the
teleconference
5
minutes
after
the
scheduled start time for this appeal, it was commenced in her absence. After the introduction had
been made and just after the appellant had begun his submission, approximately 10 minutes after the
scheduled
start
time,
the
ministry
representative
joined
the
teleconference.
The
chair
did
not
recommence the hearing and continued with it.
Nature of the Appellant’s Application
The appellant, a person designated as a Person with Disabilities, earned more than his statutorily-
designated Annual Earnings Exemption (AEE) so that when his May 2017 earnings exceeded that
AEE, the amount of the excess was deducted dollar-for-dollar from his July assistance, resulting in
him not being eligible for disability assistance for July . The appellant had spent all his money and
had none available for the support of his family, and appeals the July assistance reduction.
Documents and Information Before the Minister at Reconsideration
The evidence before the ministry at the time of the reconsideration decision included
A. Request for Reconsideration
The appellant’s Request for Reconsideration dated July 5, 2017 which included
the decision to be reconsidered
the appellant’s statement that he needs the assistance denied him because he has no food,
can’t pay bills and is looking for the government to help him out while he was down and out,
that he has been truthful with all his earnings and has been paying down his debt while
employed, but got laid off and now cannot afford food or to pay his bills; he does not think the
government’s decision is correct and he is sure there is something in writing
where the
government is responsible for families in dire need.
B. Monthly Earnings Reports
The appellant submitted monthly earnings reports for his spouse and himself dated
January 27, 2017 showing employment income of $1,931 plus child tax benefits of $1,200
February 22, 2017 showing employment income of $1,528.60 plus child tax benefits of $1,080
March 22, 2017 showing employment income of $3,434.32 plus income tax refund of $1,300
April 26, 2017 showing employment income of $ 4,368.20 plus child tax benefits of $1,300, &
May 24, 2017 showing employment income of $1,931 plus child tax benefits of $1,200
Information Provided on Appeal
Neither the appellant nor the ministry submitted additional evidence on appeal.
PART F – Reasons for Panel Decision
Issue on Appeal
The issue on appeal is whether the Ministry of Social Development and Social Innovation’s (the
ministry) reconsideration decision dated July 17, 2017, which determined that under section 9(2) of
the EAPWDR, the appellant was not eligible for disability assistance for July 2017 because his net
income determined under Schedule B of the EAPWDR exceeded his disability assistance rate
determined under Schedule A of the EAPWDR, was a reasonable application of the legislation in the
circumstances of the appellant or was reasonably supported by the evidence.
Relevant Legislation
EAPWDR Section 1 - “Unearned Income”
"unearned income" means any income that is not earned income, and includes, without limitation, money or value
received from any of the following:
(a) money, annuities, stocks, bonds, shares, and interest bearing accounts or properties;
(b) cooperative associations as defined in the Real Estate Development Marketing Act;
(c) war disability pensions, military pensions and war veterans' allowances;
(d) insurance benefits, except insurance paid as compensation for a destroyed asset;
(e) superannuation benefits;
(f) any type or class of Canada Pension Plan benefits;
(g) employment insurance;
(h) union or lodge benefits;
(i) financial assistance provided under the Employment and Assistance Act or provided by another province or
jurisdiction;
(j) workers' compensation benefits and disability payments or pensions;
(k) surviving spouses' or orphans' allowances;
(l) a trust or inheritance;
(m) rental of tools, vehicles or equipment;
(n) rental of land, self-contained suites or other property except the place of residence of an applicant or recipient;
(o) interest earned on a mortgage or agreement for sale;
(p) maintenance under a court order, a separation agreement or other agreement;
(q) education or training allowances, grants, loans, bursaries or scholarships;
(r) a lottery or a game of chance;
(s) awards of compensation under the Criminal Injury Compensation Act or awards of benefits under the Crime
Victim Assistance Act, other than an award paid for repair or replacement of damaged or destroyed property;
(t) any other financial awards or compensation;
(u) Federal Old Age Security and Guaranteed Income Supplement payments;
(v) financial contributions made by a sponsor pursuant to an undertaking given for the purposes of the
Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (Canada) or the Immigration Act (Canada);
(w) tax refunds;
(x) gifts of money, annuities, stocks, bonds, shares, and interest bearing accounts or properties;
(y) gifts in the form of payment by another person of a debt or obligation.
EAPWDR Section 9 - Limits on income
9 (1) For the purposes of the Act and this regulation, "income", in relation to a family unit, includes an amount
garnished, attached, seized, deducted or set off from the income of an applicant, a recipient or a dependant.
(2) A family unit is not eligible for disability assistance if the net income of the family unit determined under Schedule B
equals or exceeds the amount of disability assistance determined under Schedule A for a family unit matching that family
unit.
EAPWDR Section 24 - Amount of disability assistance
24 Subject to section 24.1 (3), disability assistance may be provided to or for a family unit, for a calendar month, in an
amount that is not more than
(a)
the amount determined under Schedule A, minus
(b)
the family unit's net income determined under Schedule B.
EAPWDR Schedule A Section 1
Maximum amount of disability assistance before deduction of net income
1 (1) Subject to this section and sections 3 and 6 to 9 of this Schedule, the amount of disability assistance referred to in
section 24 (a) [amount of disability assistance] of this regulation is the sum of
(a) the monthly support allowance under section 2 of this Schedule for a family unit matching the family unit of the
applicant or recipient, plus
(b) the shelter allowance calculated under sections 4 and 5 of this Schedule.
EAPWDR Schedule A Section 2 - Monthly support allowance
2 (0.1) For the purposes of this section:
"deemed dependent children", in relation to a family unit, means the persons in the family unit who are deemed to be
dependent children under subsection (5);
…..
(1) A monthly support allowance for the purpose of section 1 (a) is the sum of
(a) the amount set out in Column 3 of the following table for a family unit described in Column 1 of an applicant or
a recipient described in Column 2, plus
(a.1) subject to section 24.1 [disability assistance in the form of transportation support allowance], the amount set
out in Column 4 of the following table for the family unit, plus
(b) the amount calculated in accordance with subsections (2) to (4) for each dependent child in the family unit.
Column 3
Column 4
Item
Column 1
Column 2
Amount
Amount of
Family unit composition
Age or status of applicant or recipient
of base
transportation
support
support
($)
($)
6
Two applicants / recipients and
One applicant / recipient is a person with
869.56
52.00
one or more dependent children
disabilities, the other is not a person with
disabilities and is under 65 years of age
3 …..
EAPWDR Schedule A Section 4 - Monthly shelter allowance
4 (1) For the purposes of this section:
"family unit" includes a child who is not a dependent child and who resides in the parent's place of residence for not less
than 40% of each month, under the terms of an order or an agreement referred to in section 1 (2) of this regulation;
…..
(2) The monthly shelter allowance for a family unit to which section 14.2 of the Act does not apply is the smaller of
(a) the family unit's actual shelter costs, and
(b) the maximum set out in the following table for the applicable family size:
Item
Column 1
Column 2
Family Unit Size
Maximum Monthly Shelter
1
1 person
$375
2
2 persons
$570
3
3 persons
$660
4
4 persons
$700
5
5 persons
$750
6
6 persons
$785
7
7 persons
$820
8
8 persons
$855
9
9 persons
$890
10
10 persons
$925
EAPWDR - Schedule B - Net Income Calculation
Section 1 - Deduction and exemption rules
1 When calculating the net income of a family unit for the purposes of section 24 (b) [amount of disability assistance] of
this regulation,
(a) the following are exempt from income:
(i) any income earned by a dependent child attending school on a full-time basis;
(ii) Repealed. [B.C. Reg. 96/2017, App. 2, s. 2 (a).]
(iii) Repealed. [B.C. Reg. 48/2010, Sch. 1, s. 2 (c).]
(iv) a family bonus, except the portion treated as unearned income under section 10 (1) of this Schedule;
(iv.1) the Canada child benefit, except the portion treated as unearned income under section 10 (1) of this
Schedule;
(v) the basic child tax benefit;
(vi) a goods and services tax credit under the Income Tax Act (Canada);
(vii) a tax credit under section 8 [refundable sales tax credit], 8.1 [low income climate action tax credit] or
8.2 [BC harmonized sales tax credit] of the Income Tax Act (British Columbia);
(viii) individual redress payments granted by the government of Canada to a person of Japanese
ancestry;
(ix) individual payments granted by the government of Canada under the Extraordinary Assistance Plan
to a person infected by the human immunodeficiency virus;
(x) individual payments granted by the government of British Columbia to a person infected by the human
immunodeficiency virus or to the surviving spouse or dependent children of that person;
(xi) individual payments granted by the government of Canada under the Extraordinary Assistance Plan
to thalidomide victims;
(xii) money that is
(A) paid or payable to a person if the money is awarded to the person by an adjudicative panel in
respect of claims of abuse at Jericho Hill School for the Deaf and drawn from a lump sum
settlement paid by the government of British Columbia, or
(B) paid or payable to or for a person if the payment is in accordance with the settlement
agreement approved by the Supreme Court in Action No. C980463, Vancouver Registry;
(xiii) the BC earned income benefit;
(xiv) money paid or payable under the 1986-1990 Hepatitis C Settlement Agreement made June 15,
1999, except money paid or payable under section 4.02 or 6.01 of Schedule A or of Schedule B of that
agreement;
(xv) a rent subsidy provided by the provincial government, or by a council, board, society or governmental
agency that administers rent subsidies from the provincial government;
(xvi) Repealed. [B.C. Reg. 197/2012, Sch. 2, s. 11 (a).]
(xvii) money paid or payable to a person in settlement of a claim of abuse at an Indian residential school,
except money paid or payable as income replacement in the settlement;
(xviii) post adoption assistance payments provided under section 28 (1) or 30.1 of the Adoption
Regulation, B.C. Reg. 291/96;
(xix) a rebate of energy or fuel tax provided by the government of Canada, the government of British
Columbia, or an agency of either government;
(xx) money paid by the government of British Columbia, under a written agreement, to a person with
disabilities or to a trustee for the benefit of a person with disabilities to enable the person with disabilities
to live in the community instead of in an institution;
(xxi) Repealed. [B.C. Reg. 85/2012, Sch. 2, s. 7.]
(xxii) payments granted by the government of British Columbia under section 8 [agreement with child's kin
and others] of the Child, Family and Community Service Act;
(xxiii) payments granted by the government of British Columbia under the Ministry of Children and Family
Development's At Home Program;
(xxiv) Repealed. [B.C. Reg. 85/2012, Sch. 2, s. 7.]
(xxv) payments granted by the government of British Columbia under an agreement referred to in section
93 (1) (g) (ii) of the Child, Family and Community Service Act, for contributions to the support of a child;
(xxvi) a loan that is
(A) not greater than the amount contemplated by the recipient's business plan, accepted by the
minister under section 70.1 of this regulation, and
(B) received and used for the purposes set out in the business plan;
(xxvii) payments granted by the government of British Columbia under the Ministry of Children and Family
Development's
(A) Autism Funding: Under Age 6 Program, or
(B) Autism Funding: Ages 6 — 18 Program;
(xxviii) Repealed. [B.C. Reg. 148/2015, App. 2, s. 1 (a).]
(xxix) payments made by a health authority or a contractor of a health authority to a recipient, who is a
"person with a mental disorder" as defined in section 1 of the Mental Health Act, for the purpose of
supporting the recipient in participating in a volunteer program or in a mental health or addictions
rehabilitation program;
(xxx) a refund provided under Plan I as established under the Drug Plans Regulation;
(xxxi) payments provided by Community Living BC to assist with travel expenses for a recipient in the
family unit to attend a self-help skills program, or a supported work placement program, approved by
Community Living BC;
(xxxii) a Universal Child Care Benefit provided under the Universal Child Care Benefit Act (Canada);
(xxxiii) money paid by the government of Canada, under a settlement agreement, to persons who
contracted Hepatitis C by receiving blood or blood products in Canada prior to 1986 or after July 1, 1990,
except money paid under that agreement as income replacement;
(xxxiv) money withdrawn from a registered disability savings plan;
(xxxv) a working income tax benefit provided under the Income Tax Act (Canada);
(xxxvi) Repealed. [B.C. Reg. 180/2010, s. 2 (b).]
(xxxvii) the climate action dividend under section 13.02 of the Income Tax Act;
(xxxviii) money paid or payable to a person under the Criminal Injury Compensation Act as compensation
for non-pecuniary loss or damage for pain, suffering mental or emotional trauma, humiliation or
inconvenience that occurred when the person was under 19 years of age;
(xxxix) money that is paid or payable to or for a person if the payment is in accordance with the
settlement agreement approved by the Supreme Court in Action No. S024338, Vancouver Registry;
(xl) payments granted by the government of British Columbia under the Ministry of Children and Family
Development's Family Support Services program;
(xli) payments granted by the government of British Columbia under the Ministry of Children and Family
Development's Supported Child Development program;
(xlii) payments granted by the government of British Columbia under the Ministry of Children and Family
Development's Aboriginal Supported Child Development program;
(xliii) money paid or payable from a fund that is established by the government of British Columbia, the
government of Canada and the City of Vancouver in relation to recommendation 3.2 of the final report of
the Missing Women Commission of Inquiry;
(xliv) payments granted by the government of British Columbia under the Temporary Education Support
for Parents program;
(xlv) a BC early childhood tax benefit;
(xlvi) child support;
(xlvii) orphan's benefits under the Canada Pension Plan Act (Canada);
(xlviii) money or other value received, by will or as the result of intestacy, from the estate of a deceased
person;
(xlix) gifts;
(l) education and training allowances, grants, bursaries or scholarships, other than student financial
assistance;
(li) money withdrawn from a registered education savings plan;
(lii) compensation paid or payable under section 17 [compensation in fatal cases] or 18 [addition to
payments] of the Workers Compensation Act to a dependant, as defined in section 1 of that Act, who is a
child, as defined in section 17 of that Act;
(liii) money that is paid or payable by or for Community Living BC to or for a person if the payment is in
accordance with an award in a legal proceeding or with a settlement agreement in respect of a claim for
injury, loss or damage caused by Community Living BC, an employee of Community Living BC or a
person retained under a contract to perform services for Community Living BC;
(liv) money that is paid or payable by the government of British Columbia to or for a person if the payment
is in accordance with an award in a legal proceeding or with a settlement agreement in respect of a claim
for injury, loss or damage caused by the minister, the ministry, an employee of the ministry or a person
retained under a contract to perform services for the ministry;
(lv) a disabled contributor's child's benefit paid or payable under the Canada Pension Plan;
(lvi) payments granted under an agreement referred to in section 94 of the Child, Family and Community
Service Act;
(lvii) money that is paid or payable, in respect of a child, from property that comes into the control of, or is
held by, the Public Guardian and Trustee,
(b) any amount garnished, attached, seized, deducted or set off from income is considered to be income, except
the deductions permitted under sections 2 and 6,
(c) all earned income must be included, except the deductions permitted under section 2 and any earned
income exempted under sections 3 and 4, and
(d) all unearned income must be included, except the deductions permitted under section 6 and any income
exempted under sections 3, 7 and 8.
EAPWDR - Schedule B - Deductions from earned income
2 The only deductions permitted from earned income are the following:
(a) any amount deducted at source for
(i) income tax,
(ii) employment insurance,
(iii) medical insurance,
(iv) Canada Pension Plan,
(v) superannuation,
(vi) company pension plan, and
(vii) union dues;
(b) if the applicant or recipient provides both room and board to a person at the applicant's or recipient's place of
residence, the essential operating costs of providing the room and board;
(c) if the applicant or recipient rents rooms that are common to and part of the applicant's or recipient's place of
residence, 25% of the gross rent received from the rental of the rooms.
EAPWDR - Schedule B - Annual exemption — qualifying income
3 (1) In this section:
"base amount" means
(a) $800, in the case of a family unit that includes only one recipient,
(b) $1 000, in the case of a family unit that includes two recipients, only one of whom is designated as a person
with disabilities, and
(C) …..
General Scheme of the Legislation
The general scheme of the legislation is that a person designated as a Person with Disabilities is
allowed to earn money to a maximum annual amount established by the regulations before the
amount of his assistance is affected. When the maximum is reached, then a person’s monthly
assistance is reduced dollar-for-dollar by the amount of the person’s earnings. The reduction occurs,
not in the month following that in which earnings were made, but the month following that.
Parties’ Positions at Appeal
Appellant’s Position
The appellant’s position was that as a person trying to get ahead, who had been laid off through no
fault of his own, and though responsibly trying to pay down his debt he now found himself in a
position where he had no money. He agreed with the ministry’s calculation of his benefits totaling
$1846.74 per month. He said he went out and got a job in a warehouse promptly after being laid off
and applying for Employment Insurance, but although he is employed he would not receive pay for
two weeks. He said he has always reported his income to the ministry as he is required to. The
appellant agreed with the ministry that he received assistance as a PWD until he reached the
$12,000 AEE from his employment. He said he had no control over losing his job and needed money
to pay his rent and for food to feed his children. He argued that, as he thought he would be going
back to work, he had paid off some of his debt and now had no money. He argued that he was trying
to help himself and keep working, but it was not his fault he got laid off. He had explored alternatives
to paying off his debt, such as looking at bankruptcy, but said it would not make sense for a person of
his age to do so.
Ministry’s Position
The ministry representative explained that the required monthly earnings report determined whether
or not an applicant would be entitled to support, not for the month immediately following, but for the
month after that.
The ministry representative explained that the appellant’s monthly entitlement of $1,846.74 was made
up of monthly amounts of $869.56 support, plus another $977.18 in various benefits, which totalled
$1,846.74 per month. This amount includes a $45 per month natal supplement, which is temporary.
When the family unit no longer qualifies for the natal supplement, the monthly entitlement will be
$1,801.75
The ministry stated that with the appellant’s earnings to May 2017, the appellant’s total earnings to
date were just over $15,382, which exceeded the AEE, such that the appellant was not entitled to
support for the month of July 2017.
The ministry’s reconsideration decision stated at the very beginning that the appellant was not eligible
for assistance for the month of May 2017. The ministry representative clarified that the appellant did
actually get May assistance and determined that the statement that he was not entitled to assistance
for May was a typographical error; the last part of the reconsideration decision stated that the income
the appellant received in May, reported in June, applied to the July assistance and as the May
income took the appellant over his AEE, he would not be entitled to disability assistance for July
2017.
Therefore the appeal is concerned solely with whether or not the appellant is entitled to disability
assistance for July 2017.
The ministry argued that pursuant to section 24 EAPWDR the amount of disability assistance is
determined by a statutory formula found in that section, specifically that assistance is to be no more
than a family’s entitlement under Schedule A (the Disability Assistance Rates) minus the net income
determined under Schedule B. Here, the appellant was entitled to a $1,801.75 monthly combined
shelter, support and transportation allowances (plus the temporary $45 per month natal support). The
ministry explained that when the appellant’s AEE of $12,000 had been reached, then further earnings
for the month are deducted from the $1,801.75, and if the earnings exceed that amount the appellant
does not receive any more support for the applicable month. Thus if the appellant has exceeded his
AEE, which he did in May when his reported earnings totalled more than his AEE, he would not be
entitled to support for July 2017.
Panel Finding
The panel finds under Schedule A EAPWDR, the appellant is entitled to $1,801.75 per month total
assistance, plus the temporary $45 per month natal support. The panel also finds that the maximum
exemption of earned income under Schedule B section 3 is $1,000 per month in the case of a family
unit that includes two recipients, only one of whom is designated as a person with disabilities, and
that therefore under Schedule B EAPWDR, the appellant’s AEE is the maximum of $12,000 per year.
By earning slightly more than $15,000 as at May 2017, the appellant had exceeded his AEE. In May
2017 the appellant reported earning $4,119.59, which is more than the amount of his monthly
disability assistance rate for the month. The panel further finds that as at May 2017 the appellant, by
earning more than his AEE and by earning more in that month than his disability assistance rate, was
disqualified from receiving disability assistance for July 2017.
Having reviewed and considered all of the evidence and relevant legislation, the panel finds that the
ministry’s reconsideration decision, which determined that the appellant was not eligible for disability
assistance for July 2017 was reasonably supported by the evidence and was a reasonable
application of the applicable enactment in the appellant’s circumstances.
Conclusion
The appellant is not successful in his appeal.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.