P A R T C D e c i s i o n u n d e r A p p e a l T h e d e c i s i o n u n d e r a p p e a l i s t h e r e c o n s i d e r a t i o n d e c i s i o I n n o v a t i o n ( t h e m i n i s t r y ) d a t e d J u l y 1 o , 2 0 1 4 d e n y i n g t h m i n i s t r y f o u n d t h a t t h e a p p e l l a n t s a t i s f i e d s e c t i o n 5 5 ( 2 ) ( d D i s a b i l i t i e s R e g u l a t i o n (" E A P W D R ' ) a s h e r s h e l t e r c o s t s m o v e . H o w e v e r , t h e m i n i s t r y f u r t h e r d e t e r m i n e d t h a t t h e f o r t h e f o l l o w i n g r e a s o n s : ( a ) T h e a p p e l l a n t d i d n o t r e c e i v e t h e m i n i s t e r ' s a p p r s e c t i o n 5 5 ( 3 ) ( b ) o f t h e E A P W D R ; a n d ( b ) T h e m i n i s t r y w a s n o t s a t i s f i e d t h a t t h a t t h e m o v i n e x p e n s i v e m o d e o f m o v i n g a s r e q u i r e d b y s e c t i o P A R T D R e l e v a n t L e g i s l a t i o n E m p l o y m e n t a n d A s s i s t a n c e f o r P e r s o n s w i t h D i s a b i l i t i e s E AA T 0 0 3 ( 1 0 / 0 6 / 0 1 }A P P E i I n o f t h e M i n i s t r y o f S o c i a l D e v e l o p m e n t a n d S o c i a l e a p p e l l a n t ' s r e q u e s t f o r a m o v i n g s u p p l e m e n t . T h e ) o f t h e E m p l o y m e n t a n d A s s i s t a n c e f o r P e r s o n s w i t h w o u l d b e s i g n i f i c a n t l y r e d u c e d a s a r e s u l t o f t h e a p p e l l a n t w a s n o t e l i g i b l e f o r a m o v i n g s u p p l e m e n t o v a l p r i o r t o i n c u r r i n g t h e m o v i n g c o s t s a s r e q u i r e d b y g c o s t s i n c u r r e d b y t h e a p p e l l a n t w e r e t h e l e a s t n 5 5 ( 4 ) ( a ) o f t h e E A P W D R . R e g u l a t i o n ( E A P W D R ) s e c t i o n 5 5
P A R T E S u m m a r y o f F a c t s A m i n i s t r y r e p r e s e n t a t i v e d i d n o t a t t e n d t h e h e a r i n g . T h t h e d a t e , t i m e a n d l o c a t i o n o f t h e h e a r i n g . A c c o r d i n g l y , R e g u l a t i o n , t h e p a n e l h e a r d t h e a p p e a l i n t h e m i n i s t r y ' s T h e e v i d e n c e b e f o r e t h e m i n i s t r y a t t h e t i m e o f t h e r e c o f o l l o w i n g : 1 . T h e a p p e l l a n t ' s R e q u e s t f o r R e c o n s i d e r a t i o n ( " R f r o m a f r i e n d ( " t h e R F R L e t t e r ' ' ) ; 2 . A n u n d a t e d q u o t e r e c e i v e d b y t h e m i n i s t r y o n M a m o v i n g c o s t s i n c l u d i n g t r u c k r e n t a l , f u e l a n d l a b o 3 . A n u n d a t e d q u o t e r e c e i v e d b y t h e m i n i s t r y o n M a m o v i n g c o s t s i n c l u d i n g m o v i n g a r t i c l e s t o s t o r a g e 4 . A n u n d a t e d l e t t e r r e c e i v e d b y t h e m i n i s t r y o n J u n t h e a p p e l l a n t ' s c o s t s i n c u r r e d f o r h e r m o v e f r o m T h e R e c o n s i d e r a t i o n D e c i s i o n s t a t e s t h a t t h e a p p e l l a n t i d e s i g n a t i o n a n d i t f u r t h e r p r o v i d e s t h e f o l l o w i n g c h r o n o l o O n M a y 8 , 2 0 1 4 t h e a p p e l l a n t n o t i f i e d t h e m i n i s t r m o v i n g t o a n e w r e s i d e n c e e f f e c t i v e J u n e 1 , 2 0 1 O n M a y 9 , 2 0 1 4 t h e a p p e l l a n t r e q u e s t e d a m o v i n a p p e l l a n t t o s u b m i t q u o t e s f o r i t s c o n s i d e r a t i o n ; O n M a y 2 0 , 2 0 1 4 , t h e a p p e l l a n t s u b m i t t e d a n e v i m o v i n g t o . T h a t e v i c t i o n n o t i c e p r o v i d e d t h a t t h e M a y 2 0 1 4 . O n M a y 2 1 , 2 0 1 4 , t h e a p p e l l a n t s u b m i t t e d Q u o t e Q u o t e # 1 p r o v i d e s a " r o u g h e s t i m a t e " o f $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 p r o v i d e s a n e s t i m a t e o f " b e t w e e n $ 2 , 5 0 0 a n d $ 3 m o v i n g s e r v i c e s a t a c o s t o f $ 1 5 8 . 0 0 p e r h o u r . O n M a y 2 8 , 2 0 1 4 t h e a p p e l l a n t a d v i s e d t h e m i n i s $ 1 , 5 0 0 a n d t h e m i n i s t r y a d v i s e d t h e a p p e l l a n t t h a O n M a y 2 9 , 2 0 1 4 , t h e m i n i s t r y l e f t a m e s s a g e f o r m o v i n g u p t o t h a t d a t e w o u l d n o t b e c o n s i d e r e d f e x p e n s e s w o u l d b e c o n s i d e r e d i f s u p p o r t i n g i n f o r t r i p s , t h e c o s t o f f u e l a n d t h e a m o u n t s h e w a s r e q O n J u n e 2 3 , 2 0 1 4 , t h e a p p e l l a n t s u b m i t t e d Q u o t e l a b o u r c o s t s o f $ 1 , 2 7 8 a n d a n i t e m i z e d l i s t o f m o d e s c r i b e d b y t h e a p p e l l a n t a s ' W h a t I a c t u a l l y o w m o v e w a s d o n e o v e r a 5 w e e k e n d p e r i o d . " T h e R F R L e t t e r w a s p r e p a r e d b y a f r i e n d o f t h e a p p e l l a n p e r s o n . I n t h e l e t t e r , t h e a p p e l l a n t ' s f r i e n d p r o v i d e s a s f o T h e a p p e l l a n t w a s a n x i o u s a b o u t m o v i n g a n d d i d g r e a t d e a l o f p e r s o n a l i t e m s . S h e e x p e r i e n c e d a s e r i o u s m e d i c a l e m e r g e n c y a s e v e r a l d a y s . I n t h e c o u r s e o f h e r r e c o v e r y a t h i s h o m e t h e a p p r e n t a l o f h i s t r u c k a n d h i r i n a o f o e o n l e t o a s s i s t h E M T 0 0 3 { 1 0 / 0 6 / 0 1 )A P P E A l I e p a n e l c o n f i r m e d t h a t t h e m i n i s t r y h a d b e e n n o t i f i e d o f u n d e r s e c t i o n 8 6 ( b ) o f t h e E m p l o y m e n t a n d A s s i s t a n c e a b s e n c e . n s i d e r a t i o n d e c i s i o n c o n s i s t e d o f c o p i e s o f t h e F R " ) d a t e d J u l y 3 , 2 0 1 4 a t t a c h i n g a n u n d a t e d l e t t e r y 2 1 , 2 0 1 4 s e t t i n g o u t t h e a p p e l l a n t ' s p r o p o s e d u r c o s t s ( " Q u o t e # 1 " ) ; y 2 1 , 2 0 1 4 s e t t i n g o u t t h e a p p e l l a n t ' s p r o p o s e d , r e c y c l i n g a n d t h e d u m p ( " Q u o t e # 2 " ) ; a n d e 1 9 , 2 0 1 4 a n d p r e p a r e d b y t h e a p p e l l a n t s e t t i n g o u t h e r p r e v i o u s r e s i d e n c e ( " Q u o t e # 3 " ) . s a s i n g l e r e c i p i e n t w i t h P e r s o n s w i t h D i s a b i l i t i e s g y o f e v e n t s : y b y w a y o f a s h e l t e r i n f o r m a t i o n f o r m t h a t s h e w a s 4 ; g s u p p l e m e n t f r o m t h e m i n i s t r y w h o a d v i s e d t h e c t i o n n o t i c e t o t h e m i n i s t r y f o r t h e r e s i d e n c e s h e w a s a p p e l l a n t h a d f a i l e d t o p a y h e r r e n t f o r t h e m o n t h o f # 1 a n d Q u o t e # 2 t o t h e m i n i s t r y . a n d i s f o r l a b o u r a n d t r a n s p o r t a t i o n c o s t s . Q u o t e # 2 , 0 0 0 " f o r " r e m o v a l o f a r t i c l e s t o s t o r a g e " w i t h a d d i t i o n a l t r y t h a t Q u o t e # 1 w a s n o t $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 b u t w a s a c t u a l l y t i t w a s e x c e s s i v e l y h i g h . t h e a p p e l l a n t a d v i s i n g h e r t h a t a n y c o s t s i n c u r r e d f o r o r r e i m b u r s e m e n t b u t t h a t a n y f u t u r e m o v i n g m a t i o n w a s a l s o p r o v i d e d s e t t i n g o u t t h e n u m b e r o f u i r e d t o p a y p e o p l e w h o w e r e h e l p i n g h e r . # 3 w h i c h p r o v i d e d f o r t r u c k r e n t a l c o s t s o f $ 6 0 0 , v i n g e x p e n s e s . T h e c o s t s s e t o u t i n t h i s q u o t e a r e e " a n d t h e q u o t e f u r t h e r p r o v i d e s t h a t " t h e w o r k a n d t w h o i s n o w h e r r o o m m a t e a l o n g w i t h o n e o t h e r l l o w s : n ' t k n o w w h a t t o d o a s h e r o r i g i n a l h o m e c o n t a i n e d a t h i s h o m e r e s u l t i n g i n h e r b e i n g h o s p i t a l i z e d f o r e l l a n t d i s c u s s e d t h e p e n d i n g m o v e a s w e l l a s t h e e r .
Th at he license d h i s t ruck earlier than h e no rm all That the m o ve c ou ld o n ly hav e bee n co m plet ed avai lable but g iven the appel lant's heal th and t he he r educe d . -Th at the appell ant w as comp lete ly depend ent o n At the hearing, t he app e lla n t sta ted that she was forced t so ld and th at s he was required t o vacate the pre mises no lat deal of a n x iety an d a s a resu lt, she su ff e r e d a serious medic s h e was d i scha r ged f rom t he h ospi tal, sh e bega n t h e process of separate weeke n ds of w ork a s s he co u ld only d o it w h en stat ed th a t she was advis ed by the minis try t hat s he wa s m o v e and tha t her fri en d who o w ned a tr uck w oul d be app T h e app ellan t p r ep a red Quote #1 by dividing t he ma ximum s tate d t hat s h e w as nev er told b y the min istry worker th a In r espo nse to q u es t i ons, the app ellan t s ta ted that s h e did n e nd of May 2 014 and in f act c om ple ted t he move on M a f rom the hospit al in mid t o l a t e April 2 014 a nd starte d m wi th t he m i nistr y' s su gge stion t hat she m oved on M a y 1, 2014. The r ele a sed f rom th e hospit al, she never r et urned t o her origi her new residen ce witho ut her belo n ging s. S h e s ta ted th 2014 at her ne w resid en c e, she attended at th e minist ry landl ord p r ep a re an ev ict ion noti ce and a form was provid T he a p pel lant c a l l ed two w i tn es ses in suppor t o f her app Witness #1 gave e v i de n c e that it was dif f i cu l t for th e appellant h e r move due to h e r em otional st ate. Witness #1 g ave e app el l ant and d id not he ar the ministr y worker t ell t he appellant but rathe r, s he recal ls the w orker tellin g t he app ell ant t hat as long a lowest , it w ould b e acc epte d. I n r esponse t o q uest ions, W i t ness #1 conf ir med that aft er took up residence with her at the new residence immediately and di Wit ness #1 r ecalled t hat the mov e started in April af ter the app how many hours it woul d take to comple te the move until the original house around the 30 t h of May 2014. Witness #2 is the appellant's friend who prepared the RFR Letter and the appellant's other current He gave evid ence t h at he wa s introduced to the appellant by Witness #1 who was at the ti his roommate. He knew the appellant as an anxious p erson a medi cal problem that led to her hospitalization. Witness #2 indicated that he owned a ¾ tonne truck that he offered to the appellant to use for her move and that the cos $500. In response to questions, Witness #2 recalled that the appellant's move from her old residence began in April 2014 and went on until the end of May 2014. He recalled that he lice Witness #2 confirmed that he completed the eviction notice that was submitted by the appellant and that she had brought it to him from the ministry. Witness #2 confirmed that he assisted the appellant in preparing Quote #3 and that it was oreoared once the move was laraelv comoleted. EAAT 003( 10/06/011 AP P EA I y wo uld a nd fil led it w ith ga s t o a ssis t t h e appel lant. in less t ime i f another t ru ck and mo re l ab o ur had bee n lp av a i l able t o her the t ime could not have bee n the la bour ers available. o m o ve fr o m he r pre vious residence as it wa s b eing er than May 31 , 2014 . This cause d her a great a l cond ition and w as admitted to a h o spital. Once moving to her new residence and t hat too k 5 people were a vai l a b le to help h er. The appel lant required to pro vide two estimat es for the cost of her ro ved a s long as his quote w as l ower th an the other. fig ure i n Q uote #2 ($ 3, 00 0) in ha l f . T he appellant t her q uote s had to b e i n writing. ot have to vaca te her ori ginal reside n ce until t he y 30 , 20 14. The appellant r ec all e d being disc har ged oving so meti m e aft er th at and as su ch she d isag ree s appellant s tat ed that when she was nal resid en c e to live bu t rather m oved in di rect l y to at a s she did not have m oney to p a y ren t on M a y 1, o f f i ce wher e a w o rk er advise d her to ha v e her n e w ed t o her to give to h er landlo rd . eal. B oth are h er house m a tes at he r new r e sidence . to und e r s tand th e m i n i s t ry' s advice re gardi n g v i denc e that she att ende d t he ministry offi ce wi t h the that s h e wa s requ ired to prov i d e writ te n qu o t es s he r f r iend with the tr uck' s qu o t e w as th e th e a pp e llant was re leas ed from the h os pi tal she d no t retu rn to the or i ginal residence. e l la n t le ft the hosp i tal and that it was n o t known after it was finished and the last pieces were out of roommat e. me and is currently nd h e was pre s e nt during the appellant's t t o l icense it and fill it with gas was approximately nsed his truck sometim e in April 2014.
PART F -Reasons for Panel Decisio n The i s sue on the app eal is whether the Ministry rea sonabl of moving costs. The ministry found th a t th e app ellant satisfied section Assistance for Persons w ith Disabilities Regulati on ("EAPW red uc e d a s a re s ult of the m ove. H o w e ver, the ministry further determin for a mo vin g sup plem ent fo r the follow ing reasons: (a) The app e ll a n t did not receive the minister's app ro se c ti on 55(3)(b) of the EAPWDR; and (b) The ministry was not sat i sfi ed that tha t the moving costs inc expensive mode o f moving a s r equired by section 55(4)(a) of th The criteria for eligibil ity for a movi ng supplement are set out in se Su pp lements f o r m o ving, trans portati o n a nd living co st s 55 ( 1) In t h is se c ti on : " l i ving cost" means th e cos t of acco mmod a tion a n d meals; "movin g cost" me a ns t he cos t of m o ving a famil y unit a n d its pe " tran sportat ion c o st" means th e cost of tra velling from o ne place to (2) Subjec t to subsecti on s (3) a nd (4), t he mi nist e r m a y provide disab il ity a ssist ance or hardship a s sist ance t o a ss ist wi t h one or ( a) mo ving costs r equir ed to m ove anywhere in C anada , i f a re c on firmed employme nt t hat wo uld sig n ificantl y pr omo t e t h e financ r equ ired t o move to begi n that employment; ( b ) moving c osts require d t o mo v e to anothe r provi nce or country, if circ umstance s ; ( c) moving cost s re qu ire d to m ove w ithin a muni c i pal i ty or un incor unin c o r por ate d a rea becaus e the fa mi ly unit's rented r e s idential acc to vacate has been given, or has be en co nd em ned; {d) moving cost s r equired t o move w it h in a muni c ipal ity or u n i nc unincorporated area if the family unit's shelter costs would be significantly reduced as a result of the move; ( e) moving costs required to move to another area in British Columbia to avo any person in the family unit; (f) transportat i on costs and living cost s r equir e d to at tend a h e Child, Family and Community SeNice Act, if a recipient is given notice of the hearing and is a party to the proceeding; (g) transportation costs, living costs, child care costs and fees (i) the required attendance of a recipient in the fami ly unit at a hearing, or (ii) other requireme nts a recipient in the family u nit must f u l fil in connection with the exercise of a ma i n t ena nce right as signed ass ign maintenance rig hts]. (3) A family unit is eligible for a supplement under this section only if (a) there are no resources available to the family unit to cover the costs for which t (b) a recipient in the family unit receives the minister's approval before incurring those costs. (4) A supplement may be provided under this section only to assist with (a) the cost of the least expensive appropriate mode of moving or EMT003(10/06/01) APPEA I y deni ed the appellant's request for reimbu r sement 55 (2}(d) of the Employment and DR") as her s helter cos ts w oul d be s ig n ificantly ed that th e appellan t was not eligible val prior t o i nc ur ring t he m oving co s ts as re quired b y ur red by the appellant were the least e EAPWDR. ct ion 55 of the EAPWDR as follow s: rso nal ef fec t s f rom on e pl a c e t o ano ther; anot her . a supplement to or fo r a f am i ly u nit that is eligi b le for m ore of the f o llowi n g : c i pien t in the fa mi ly unit i s no t work in g b u t has ar ra n ged i a l i ndepe ndence of t h e family u ni t a n d the r ecipien t is the f amil y unit is r equire d to move to impr ove its li v i n g por a ted a r ea or to a n adja c ent munic ipa lity or omm od ati o n is being s ol d or dem olished and a n otice orp orate d are a or to an adjacent mu nicipality or i d an imminent threat to the physical safety of a ring relating to a child pr otection pro ceeding und e r the resulting from to the minister under section 17 [cat eg o r i es that must h e su pple ment ma y be provided, and ATTACH EXTRA PAGES IF NECESSARY
tr anspor t ation , and (b) in the c ase o f a su pplement under s ubsec tion (2) (f) o r (g), th [ am. B.C . Re g. 275 /20 04, s . 2.] The issuance of a moving supplem ent to a n e l igible f am subject to condit ion s tha t m ust be me t by the app li cant. The fam il y uni t mus t b e eligib le f or d i sability or ha r d ship conditi o ns a s se t ou t i n s ec t io n 55(2) (a ) -(e ) . F urther, an ap 1. There m ust be no resource s a vail able t o the f am be provide d ( s e cti on 5 5(3) ( a) EAPWDR ); 2. The recipien t must rec eive pri o r ap pro v al from the 55(3) (b ) EA PW D R); and 3. The s u pp l e men t may be provided o n ly to a s sist of mo v ing or tra nspor t ation ( sect i on 55(4)( a) EAP I n the p r e sen t ca se , t h e ap pel lant rece ive s disabil ity a ssi secti o n 55( 2 )( d ) o f the EAPWDR in that her move would signif mini st ry take s the posi tion that t he ap pellant is n ot eligible fo rece i ve pri or ap pro v a l f rom th e min istry b e f ore i ncurr ing sa tisf i ed t h at the app ellant's m o vin g c os t s we r e the least In her Not ice of Appe al dated July 22, 201 4, the app ellant wo ul d be paid for by the M inistry . She says she feel s badl p ai d . At the hearing, the app ell ant stated further that s h quote s to t h e min ist r y and tha t she w a s told by t he minis it w o uld be se lected for appr oval. Least E xpens i v e App ropriat e Mod e of Mo vi ng Se ct i o n 55(4)(a) of the EAPWDR provides t ha t a mo vi ng suppl t he least e x p ensi ve ap propriate mo de of m ov in g o r trans The appell ant gave eviden c e tha t she wa s n ot t old b y her mini written quo tes for her m oving expenses. This is supp or te with the a p pellant. F ur ther, the appellant g ave e v id ence that sh as Witness #2's q u o te was the lowest, h is would be ap proved. The appellant prepared two quotes and provided them to the ministry. ministry on May 21, 2014. Quote #1 provides a "rough estimate" of $15,000 although this was later revised to $1,500.00. Q uote #2 provides a cost of between $2,500 and $3,000 for removal of art further co st of $158/h our for all other moving costs. In the Reconsideration Decision both of these quotes were deemed by the m i n i st r y to be too high and unrea s onable. appellant submitted quote #3 to the ministry which provided the actual costs of moving at $1,876 and truck rental. Returning to the Reconsideration Decision, the minist ry unrea sonable and d id not satisfy s.55(4 ) (a ) of the EAPWDR as being the least expensive appropriate mode of movina but it does not provide anv reasons for that view. EAAT003(10/06/01) I A_P_ P_ E A L --------� I L e least ex pensive appropriate living costs. ily u nit lies w ithin the discretion of the minist e r a n d is ass is t ance and the n must satis fy one or m ore o f the plican t must als o satisf y each of t he fo llowing: i ly u nit t o c over the co st s f or wh ich the su pp lem en t pa y minis try b ef o re in c urri ng the moving costs (section with t he cos t of t he lea st expen si v e appropriate m ode WDR): stance a n d t h e mini stry is sati sfie d tha t sh e me ets icantly red uce her sh e lter costs. Ho wever, the r the m o vin g su pple ment because sh e di d n ot t h e mo v ing costs in is sue and beca use i t is not e xpen siv e approp riate mode o f moving . stat es that sh e w a s told by her worke r that her move y that the peo ple w ho hel pe d her a re no t g e t ting e di d n ot kno w that she ne eded t o provid e wri tt e n try that as l ong a s Witne ss #2's q u o t e wa s the lowest ement ma y be pro vi ded t o as sis t wit h t he cost of porta ti o n . s try w o rke r that she w a s req uired to p r ovi d e d by Witness #1 who at ten ded at th e mini st r y office e was t old by the ministry worker that so long Both are stamped as r e ceived by th e icles to storage plu s a S ubseq uent to the move being completed, the for labour takes the view that Quote #1 and Quote #2 were While Quote #1 was nrenared bv the annellant
hers elf, Quote #2 w a s provi d ed by a l ocal mo vi ng c ompany. It Quo t e # 1 by d i vidin g th e higher am ou nt as s e t out i n Quote # the fac t th a t the actua l moving c o sts wer e on l y $ 376 mor f in d t ha t the minist ry' s de t e rm i nati o n that th e a p pel l a n t's m a ppropriate mode of moving was unreas onabl e . Prio r A pp rov al from t h e Mini str y Sectio n 55(3 } ( b) of the EAP WD R provide s th at a fam i ly resou rces to the fa mily unit to cove r t he cos ts for which t the family unit rece i v es the min ister's appr oval be fore incu in the r e co nsi d erat ion decision with t he a ppell ant's la ck o Whil e t he panel r eco gnize s that the a p pella n t was u nder deal of di s tre ss, th e evidence indic ate s that t he appe l l a nt mini s t ry approva l. The appellan t an d the w itnes ses are c m id to late Ap r i l 2014 and c onti nue d o v e r the cou r se of 2 014. Q uote #1 and Qu ote #2 were not receiv ed by t h e m ove being complete. Despite the panel's f inding wi th r es pect t o the unre a sonable nat a pp ell ant's moving costs w er e no t th e least expe n s ive appropriate n atu r e of sect ion 55(3}(b) o f the EAPW DR, the p ane l fi nds th e appellant did no t re ceive the min ist er's a p pro v a l before has reques t e d reimb urse m e n t in the fo rm of a mo v ing s upp Conclus ion Gi ven the p a nel's fin d i ng s a bove, the panel fi nds tha t the mi sup ported by t h e eviden ce and c o nfirms the de c isi o n pursuant to Section 24(2)( As si stan ce Act. EMT003(10/06/01) APP E AL# I was th e appellant ' s evidence th a t she pre pared 2 ($3,00 0} i n h alf. T hese fac t ors, coupl e d with e than t he lowest q uot e pro v i ded lead s the panel to oving c os ts were no t th e lea st exp e nsiv e un it i s elig ib le for a moving sup plement i f t he r e a re no he s u pplement may b e p rovided and if a recipi ent in rrin g t hos e cost s. No issue is taken by t h e min ist ry f r esource s t o co ver t he costs of h e r mo v e . a tim e r es traint to move which c a use d her a great b e ga n incurring her mo v ing c o sts p rio r to s ee k i ng on s i ste n t i n th at the move beg a n s om e ti m e during 5 weeken ds until the mov e was comple te on May 30 , min istry u ntil May 2 1, 2014 , ju s t ni ne d ays p rior to the ure of th e min istry's d e terminat ion that the mo de of movi ng, given the mandato ry that the m ini stry w a s reasonabl e i n de termi nin g that i n c u rr ing the mov in g costs for w hic h t he a ppe ll a nt lement. nistr y' s re c o n s id er ati o n deci s ion wa s reasona bly a) of th e Empl oym e nt and
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.