I APPEAL# I PART C -Decision under Appeal The decision under appeal is the ministry's reconsideration decision dated March 12, 2012 which found that the appellant did not meet three of the five statutory requirements of Section 2 of the Employment and Assistance for Persons with Disabilities Act for designation as a person with disabilities (PWD}. The ministry found that the appellant met the age requirement and that his impairment is likely to continue for at least two years. However, the ministry was not satisfied that the evidence establishes that he has a severe physical or mental impairment. The ministry was also not satisfied that the appellant's daily living activities (DLA) are, in the opinion of a prescribed professional, directly and significantly restricted either continuously or periodically far extended periods. As the ministry found that the appellant is not significantly restricted with DLA, it could not be determined that he requires the significant help or supervision of another person, the use of an assistive device, or the services of an assistance animal to perform DLA. PART D -Relevant Legislation Employment and Assistance for Persons with Disabilities Act (EAPWDA}, Section 2 , Employment and Assistance for Persons with Disabilities Regulation (EAPWDR), Section 2
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.